Opinion
11hon MSNOpinion
Indirect funds are essential for supporting the research infrastructure needed to develop innovative solutions to the most pressing health challenges.
These indirect costs are negotiated with each research institution and average close to 30 percent of the amount awarded for ...
The change would cap the maximum "indirect cost rate" research institutions charge the government at 15% of any given grant.
NIH's abrupt policy change caps indirect research costs at 15%, sparking debate over its impact on scientific progress and ...
What do National Institutes of Health funding cuts mean for universities? We ask Holden Thorp, editor-in-chief of the journal ...
The planned $4 billion cut in funding for scientific inquiry to the nation’s universities and academic medical institutions ...
The National Institutes of Health has announced plans to slash about $4 billion in funding for biomedical research — a move that could have an immediate impact on research at universities ...
Discover how obesity drugs may reduce alcohol consumption alongside weight loss. Learn about this promising new research.
The Trump administration is moving to cut diversity, equity, and inclusion programs at the National Institutes of Health and National Science Foundation, the very programs that made it possible ...
This is an excerpt of an article from STAT, the health and medicine news site that’s a partner to the Globe. For a full version of this story, visit STAT. The National Institutes of Health ...
Restored CDC webpages feature strong language rejecting policies on gender identity and their impact on public health.
Agency admits in memo that halting funding violates court orders. Best of CES 2025 Awards ➜ We may earn a commission when you ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results